And Introduction to Spanish Verb Conjugation

The concept of verb conjugation is the same as in English — only the details are far more complicated. Verb conjugation refers to the process of changing a verb form to provide information about the action being performed. The form of the verb can give us some idea about who is performing the action, when the action is being performed, and the relation of the verb to other parts of the sentence. To better understand the concept of conjugation in Spanish, lets look at some conjugation forms in English and compare them with some Spanish forms. In the examples below, the English verbs are explained first, followed by the corresponding Spanish forms. If youre a beginner, dont worry for now about what terms like present tense, auxiliary verb and indicative mean. If you cant understand what they refer to by the examples given, you will learn them in your later studies. This lesson isnt intended to be an exhaustive analysis of the subject, but rather just enough that you can grasp the concept of how conjugation works. Infinitive To talk is the infinitive form of the verb in English. It is the basic form of the verb, by itself conveying no information about the verb action. It can be used as a noun, as in To talk in public is difficult. (Some grammarians classify talk by itself as the infinitive).The same things are true of Spanish infinitives; they convey no information about the verb action, and they can be used as nouns. Infinitives in Spanish always end in -ar, -er or -ir. The verb for to talk is hablar. Present-tense indicative verbs I talk, you talk, he talks, she talks, we talk, they talk. In English, an -s is added at the end of most verbs to indicate that it is being used in the third-person, present-tense singular form. No suffix is added to indicate any subject other than the third person (someone other than the person speaking, also known as the first person, or the person being spoken to, the second person). Thus we say, I speak, you speak, he speaks, she speaks, we speak, they speak.In Spanish, various endings are attached to verbs to indicate who is speaking for first-, second-, and third-person forms in the singular and plural. For regular verbs, the -ar, -er or -ir at the end is replaced with the appropriate ending. Examples: yo hablo, I talk; tà º hablas, you (singular) talk; à ©l habla, he talks; ella habla, she talks; nosotros hablamos, we talk; ellos hablan, they talk. In many cases the verb form gives enough information that it isnt necessary to indicate with a subject noun or pronoun who is pe rforming the action. Example: canto, I sing. Future-tense indicative I will talk, you will talk, he will talk, we will talk, they will talk. In English, the future tense is formed by using the auxiliary verb will.For the future tense, Spanish uses a set of verb endings that indicate who is performing the action as well as indicate that it is happening in the future. Examples: hablarà ©, I will speak; hablarà ¡s, you (singular) will speak; à ©l hablarà ¡, he will speak; hablaremos, we will speak; hablarà ¡n, they will speak. Preterite (a type of past tense) I talked, you talked, he talked, we talked, they talked. In English, the simple past tense usually is formed by adding -ed.Spanish endings for the preterite tense also indicate who performed the action. Examples: hablà ©, I talked; hablaste, you (singular) talked; hablà ³, she talked; hablamos, we talked; hablaron, they talked. Present perfect (another type of past tense) I have talked, you have talked, he has talked, we have talked, they have talked. In English, the present perfect is formed by using the present tense of to have and adding a participle, which usually ends in -ed.The rule in Spanish is basically the same. Forms of haber are followed by a participle, which usually ends in -ado or -ido. Examples: he hablado, I have spoken; à ©l ha hablado, he has spoken. The gerund and progressive tenses I am talking, you are talking, she is talking, we are talking, they are talking. English forms a gerund by adding -ing to the end of verbs and uses it in conjunction with forms of to be to indicate a continuity of action.Spanish has a corresponding form that ends in -ndo and is used with forms of estar (to be). But it is used less often in Spanish than in English. Examples: estoy hablando, I am talking; estuvo hablando, he was talking. Subjunctive mood If I were rich ... If that be the case ... English sometimes uses the subjunctive mood to indicate something that is hypothetical or contrary to fact. Distinctive forms for the subjunctive mood, although they used to be somewhat common, are nearly absent from modern English conversation.Spanish also uses a subjunctive mood, but it is far more common than in English. Going into details about its use is beyond the scope of this lesson, but it is usually used in dependent clauses. Example: In Quiero que ella hable (I want her to talk, or, literally, I want that she talk.), hable is in the subjunctive mood. Commands (imperative mood) Talk. English has a simple command form based on an unconjugated form of the verb. To give a command, you simply use the infinitive without the to.Spanish has both formal and familiar requests that are indicated by verb endings. Examples: hable (usted), habla (tà º), (you) talk. In some circumstances, such as in recipes, the infinitive can also function as a type of comand. Other verb forms I could talk, I would talk, I could have talked, I will have talked, I was talking, I will be talking. English uses several auxiliary verbs to convey a sense of time for a verbs action.Spanish uses the verb haber and/or a variety of endings to convey a similar sense of time. Most learning Spanish as a second language learn these forms at an intermediate level. Summary As you can see, the verb forms are much more extensive in Spanish than they are in English. Complicating things is that the most common verbs are usually  irregular, as they are in English (I go, but I went, and I see, but I saw). The important thing to keep in mind is that Spanish usually uses endings to more fully convey the nature of the action, while English is much more likely to use auxiliary verbs and other sentence components.

Australian Securities And Investments Commission - 1690 Words

During the last decade the Australian economy has experienced continuous growth and has featured contained inflation, low unemployment and a strong and stable financial system. By 2012, Australia has experienced more than 20 years of continuous economic growth, averaging 3.5% a year. Australia was comparatively unaffected by the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2008 as the banking system remained strong and inflation was controlled to a manageable point, this event has benefited Australia as a whole allowing the country to excel further than other economies that faced the worst of the Global financial Crisis, a core reason to this resistance is the strong and well established regulatory body systems that Australia had put in place. These†¦show more content†¦These laws allow for ordinary consumers to have confidence within their financial institutions and therefore allow them to deposit and borrow money with no concern for fraud or negligence to occur, a previous Deputy prim e minister Wayne Swan states Australia s financial system has performed better than any other during the global recession and these reforms will ensure that Australia s regulatory arrangements remain among the best in the world in which he refers to the ASIC s ability to control and keep consumer confidence. Another of Australia’s crucial regulatory body systems is the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority or known to many as APRA, According to http://www.apra.gov.au/ this organisation ‘primarily supervises building societies, credit unions, banks, general insurance, life insurance companies and superannuation funds. These various institutions hold an estimated 4 trillion dollars in assets for 23 million Australian depositors, policyholders and superannuation fund members’.

Violence in the Arts †Plato vs. Aristotle Essay Example For Students

Violence in the Arts ?– Plato vs. Aristotle Essay Nowadays, it is hard to turn on a television program, catch a movie or buy your younger sibling a video game without encountering a warning for extreme violence. Everyday, our lives are exposed to violence on the Screen, whether it is in the latest Sopranos episode or even watching the six oclock news. For quite 3 While now, people hue been demanding that stricter censorship be placed on the media, especially those programs and video games that can easily be Obtained by the youth, due to their feelings that this violence can influence people to act out. However, this is not a new idea. Back in ancient Greece, the philosopher Plato believed that exposure to the emotions of the arts (especially drama) would encourage people to act out violent emotions portrayed in the drama. As documented in his work The Republic, Plato believed strongly that the perfect life was comprised of total balance and harmony in ones mindset and that any stimulated emotions would result in an imbalance. The first theorist to challenge Plats idea was his well-known student, Aristotle. Aristotle felt that exposure to the strong emotions of the arts had a positive psychological effect on people because it gave them a chance to let out any emotional frustrations that they might have bottled up inside. I concur with the ideas of Plato, being that the media has become such an influential authority in our society, and the constant exposure to violent behavior within the media is creating numbness to it, especially within our children, who are less able to distinguish between factual and fictional. Our society, beginning with a childs parents, should become trice faith Limiting exposure to violent visual entertainment, and only allow a moderate, if any, amount of violence to be seen by impressionable children and young adults. Drama had only recently developed in Ancient Greece when Plato began speaking against it, however it was already a popular part Of Greek tradition. The somewhat violent plots that were also deeply entrenched in religious and family tradition, showed morbid situations; such as Oedipus Rexes in Which a son kills his father and marries his mother. Plato perceived the dramas as dangerous, cause he felt that they created confusion, miscommunication and ignorance. He also felt that the entire worlds evils came from a defective sense of reality and that these dramas promoted that. For example, take a young child who grew up somewhat isolated from the outside world and whose only outlet to our society is through the media. His steady contact with violent programs (which in the end, show a happy conclusion no matter what happens throughout) may convince him that this type to behavior is normal and accepted. Plato was concerned especially about the influence that drama and even pornography loud have on children, because he felt that their minds were not developed to the full extent in order to differentiate between the right and wrong that they see in the dramas. Many people will be quick to agree that a child should not watch a rated R action movie, yet they still allow them to view a Saturday morning cartoon in which the main character gets run over every episode and still comes back the next week. This can create a faulty understanding Of reality to a child, as well as an unsuspecting adult, because it does not clarify that death is final. What about the movies that emulate and perhaps glorify the lives Of drug dealers and gangs? Are they encouraging one to participate in this type of lifestyle by making it seem cool and their answer to their life situation or are they simply depicting reality of what goes on in todays inner cities? These questions are similar to an old saying: which came first, the chicken or the egg? .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 , .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 .postImageUrl , .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 , .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075:hover , .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075:visited , .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075:active { border:0!important; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075:active , .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075 .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u6d28160381528d7d71f28dbda4bf2075:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Lottery Analysis EssayThe skewed perspective portrayed by movies, television, and video games can create a lack of sensitivity to emotional and/or physical Harry, It may even cause them to want to emulate the kind of lifestyle hey are seeing, thinking that it is a reflection to real elite. Aristotle, on the other hand, believed that the best dramas were those which an ordinary person greatly misjudges, because this allowed the ordinary people who viewed it to realize the error and make it a moral learning experience a moral laboratory in which eve can see our inner urges acted out and learn from the tragic consequences. (Rosenstein, peg. 52) I agree somewhat with Plats views on censorship, since you never know exactly how someone will react to viewing a violent situation and butcher they will be able to use their common sense and judgment to refrain from copying the actions of the characters. There have been many examples Of copycats who have gotten their ideas from watching a violent film, but many will still argue that the majority is simply coincidence. In the end Of the thriller Scream, Billy makes an important comment to Sidney, telling her not to blame the movies! Movies dont create psychos! Movies make psychos more creative'. However, a point that must be understood is that even though Aristotle was for the viewing of emotionally charged dramas, he also advocated a moderation of these violent stories. We should remember that the drama that Aristotle recommended as beneficial was not available twenty-four hours a day, as it is on a TV set; Greek dramas were originally performed once a year. (Rosenstein, peg. 5) If Aristotle were around today, he probably would advise about the effects of being overly exposed to the elements of moral decay in the visual entertainment and suggest a need for censorship as 4 well. Viewing a documentary on the Civil War in a students classroom is one thing, since those are factual events that took place in our societys history, UT allowing a child to play the video game Mortal Combat on a daily basis is unnecessary and does not provide an educational experience or an emotional outlet when constantly employed as a means of entertainment. Plato felt that censorship was necessary, especially for childrens materials, because he didnt trust people to distinguish between right and wrong on their own. In order to avoid a complete and rigid censorship put on by our societys government, parents should on their own monitor what their children are exposed to. I believe that the parent should decide what amount of violence, if any, they ant their child to be exposed to and regulate that amount strictly until that child has reached an age in Which he or she can determine between fantasy/ reality, good/bad. Parents should also explain that the reality that is depicted in films, television programs and video games are not necessarily how real life is conducted. Parents with young children may want to compare it to a fairy tale, such as Hansel and Greeter, to illustrate a moralistic point. I feel that in order to reduce the chances of violent behavior later on in a persons life. They need to be aught, as a child that the way they see disagreements and issues being handled in violent entertainment is not the appropriate manner of solving them. This way the child will grow to understand and refrain from acting out the emotions represented in their favorite action movie or video game, In summary, feel that after reflecting on Plato and Aristotle views on the problem of over stimulation of the emotions by drama, found that I have been influenced by both of their opinions. Both philosophers made valid points, which should be recognized by todays society.